Saturday 16 March 2013

we're all worthless and weak

We all know the Darwinian argument of how things
change over time. Well, we are sentient enough to
be able to see the changes in modern humans, as
they happen, if we're not too wed to tv/Net
diabetic-inducing food, alcohol/drugs or
overwork.

It's obvious that, if you stop doing an action, your
body becomes less able to do it. So, we no longer
hunt with primitive weapons, so we no longer
are able to hunt. That also means we have less
strength, despite what wonders steroids have
brought us.

I've noticed in only one generation of my family
what differences life brings to the architecture
and functioning of a human. My father's family were
subsistence farmers. My dad, although he didn't
show off, was built like an ox, and my uncles
too, except for one. They had to be. Simple diet,
hard life, many chores. bam.
I have been a gym goer most of my life, and I'll
never be that strong. Life did not demand
much from me, physically. I was raised as
a Western suburban human.

I'll briefly recount a night of stupidity that I
caused, that showed me the difference. I took
my father's car to town, drove like an idiot and
got into a minor fender-bender. The crash
meant that the right front wheel was rubbing the
tire when I turned in any direction.
So, I tried to bend it back to no avail and drove
it with the tire grinding every time I turned.
I took the car home. In two tugs, the father
unit had fixed it, with my friend as a witness.
And I mean 1970 heavy Chevy, not the modern
crap.

We're also losing memory capacity with mobile-
phone -cum secretary. Of course, that started
with the written word, as Socrates had warned.
[I'll find that later]
Anyway, we also don't like cooking. Pretty soon
we'll be unable to avoid starvation if convenience
stores close for a month, or if the superstore which
is your only source of food decides they can't make
money any more, and closes shop. See the
'canuck' blog soon.




["you're all worthless & weak" check 2:15 onward]

Checkit:  Independent
Modern man 'a wimp', says anthropologist
Reuters
Many prehistoric Australian aboriginals could have outrun world 100 and 200 metres record holder Usain Bolt in modern conditions.
Some Tutsi men in Rwanda exceeded the current world high jump record of 2.45 meters during initiation ceremonies in which they had to jump at least their own height to progress to manhood.
Any Neanderthal woman could have beaten former bodybuilder and current California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in an arm wrestle.
These and other eye-catching claims are detailed in a book by Australian anthropologist Peter McAllister entitled "Manthropology" and provocatively sub-titled "The Science of the Inadequate Modern Male.
McAllister sets out his stall in the opening sentence of the prologue.
"If you're reading this then you - or the male you have bought it for - are the worst man in history.
"No ifs, no buts -- the worst man, period...As a class we are in fact the sorriest cohort of masculine Homo sapiens to ever walk the planet."
Delving into a wide range of source material McAllister finds evidence he believes proves that modern man is inferior to his predecessors in, among other fields, the basic Olympic athletics disciplines of running and jumping.
His conclusions about the speed of Australian aboriginals 20,000 years ago are based on a set of footprints, preserved in a fossilized claypan lake bed, of six men chasing prey.
An analysis of the footsteps of one of the men, dubbed T8, shows he reached speeds of 37 kph on a soft, muddy lake edge. Bolt, by comparison, reached a top speed of 42 kph during his then world 100 meters record of 9.69 seconds at last year's Beijing Olympics.
In an interview in the English university town of Cambridge where he was temporarily resident, McAllister said that, with modern training, spiked shoes and rubberized tracks, aboriginal hunters might have reached speeds of 45 kph.
... Turning to the high jump, McAllister said photographs taken by a German anthropologist showed young men jumping heights of up to 2.52 meters in the early years of last century.
"It was an initiation ritual, everybody had to do it. They had to be able to jump their own height to progress to manhood," he said.
"It was something they did all the time and they lived very active lives from a very early age. They developed very phenomenal abilities in jumping. They were jumping from boyhood onwards to prove themselves."
McAllister said a Neanderthal woman had 10 percent more muscle bulk than modern European man. Trained to capacity she would have reached 90 percent of Schwarzenegger's bulk at his peak in the 1970s.
... Manthropology abounds with other examples:
* Roman legions completed more than one-and-a-half marathons a day carrying more than half their body weight in equipment.
* Athens employed 30,000 rowers who could all exceed the achievements of modern oarsmen.
* Australian aboriginals threw a hardwood spear 110 meters or more (the current world javelin record is 98.48).
McAllister said it was difficult to equate the ancient spear with the modern javelin but added: "Given other evidence of Aboriginal man's superb athleticism you'd have to wonder whether they couldn't have taken out every modern javelin event they entered."
Why the decline?
"We are so inactive these days and have been since the industrial revolution really kicked into gear," McAllister replied. "These people were much more robust than we were.
... "At the start of the industrial revolution there are statistics about how much harder people worked then.
"The human body is very plastic and it responds to stress. We have lost 40 percent of the shafts of our long bones because we have much less of a muscular load placed upon them these days.
"We are simply not exposed to the same loads or challenges that people were in the ancient past and even in the recent past so our bodies haven't developed. Even the level of training that we do, our elite athletes, doesn't come close to replicating that.
"We wouldn't want to go back to the brutality of those days but there are some things we would do well to profit from."

Saturday 9 March 2013

our feet were made for running

I've been big on this revolution in human kinesiology
and  moving. I guess I walk a lot and jog and go to
the gym and make those machines work.

However, in the back of my mind was the idea from
documentaries and the movie The Gods Must
be Crazy that the way the bushmen walked was
interesting. If you think about it, they walk in the
way that our ancestors did when in the bush
hunting animals. People walked and ran on
the front pad of the feet mostly because it
was most efficient and painless, if your foot
pad is tough.
BTW I know that many places in Europe where
the early 20th century was a time of great
barefootedness.
Anyway, it turns out that running on the pads of your
feet is the best. forget the fancy shoes. try sandals
like the Tarahumara Aboriginals:


Lots of runners who strike the ground with their
heals are causing problems to their bodies and
particularly their knees.
I could even say that heel -striking walkers are
doing the same. You are probably do harm to
yourself by heel-striking excessively.
For 5 or 6 years now, I've changed my walking too.
Most days, I feel like a teenager. This is not
quite like being light in the loafers or pad striking
like an autistic person. It's actually mechanically
smooth, and feels easy.
Apparently you need to be careful because such
changes to your walking can mess up your calf
muscles.
It seems to have a relationship with the use of
heels in footwear, which is the norm for
most adults. It gives the same "imbalance"
to the foot and the body when walking. and
for gals, it sure makes their calves look
good, which makes their thighs and
hams look good and lastly ending up
where the eyes usually go , to the
butt.

[video here] Russian chicks & their ball handling

Also, for the mechanics of running,
watch Usain Bolt run in slow-mo.
Watch where in his stride that his
foot hits the ground.

[video here]

Checkit-
Here's a short blurb in the Metro:

Springy step: Forget that pricey pair of sweatshop
-made trainers, it seems you're better off running
barefoot. More than 75 % of us who run while
wearing shoes heel strike, impacting leg joints
1000 times each mile. But, barefoot runners use
the arch of  the foot as a spring, reducing the impact
of each stride. "Our feet were made for running"
said Harvard's Prof Daniel Lieberman.